Choosing the right legal representation after a car accident is a critical decision. With numerous law firms advertising their services, it’s essential to look beyond the slogans and understand real client experiences. Dan Newlin and Partners is a well-known firm, heavily advertised, but what do clients actually say about their services? This review delves into a firsthand account to provide a balanced perspective for anyone considering this firm.
In September 2016, a car accident left an individual with a back injury through no fault of their own. Seeking legal help, and influenced by television advertising, they chose Dan Newlin and Partners. The initial process seemed straightforward. An intake representative visited their home to gather information, and subsequent steps were communicated via phone and email. This remote approach, while convenient for some, meant the client never met with their attorney face-to-face after the initial consultation.
The client was directed to a medical facility, described as a “one-stop shop,” offering a range of treatments including chiropractic care, electro shock therapy, massage, injections, and exercise therapy, all within the same location. While this integrated approach might appear efficient, it later presented significant issues.
Communication within the firm seemed to be a point of concern. The originally assigned attorney was changed without proactively informing the client. This lack of transparency added to a feeling of detachment from their legal representation. Furthermore, the client was informed of a “small cap amount” limiting the potential settlement, and that payouts to medical providers would come from this capped sum, impacting the final amount received by the client.
Upon settlement, the client’s financial outcome was far from satisfactory. A substantial portion of the settlement was consumed by the “one-stop shop’s” medical bills. Compounding the financial strain, attempts to claim compensation from their personal accident policy for visits to this facility were denied. The reason? The facility reportedly did not employ licensed physical therapists, a crucial requirement for insurance reimbursement. This revelation, confirmed by the medical office itself, resulted in a loss of thousands of dollars for the client, on top of out-of-pocket expenses for other doctor visits covered by their personal insurance.
Adding to the disappointment, the client shared their experience with others and received warnings about Dan Newlin and Partners, being told to expect minimal recovery. These warnings unfortunately proved accurate. The client expresses that the entire process “was not worth it,” particularly highlighting the contrast between advertised large settlements and their own reality. Despite ongoing pain from the injury and no funds left for further treatment, their experience with Dan Newlin and Partners left them unable to recommend the firm to others.
This review serves as a cautionary tale, emphasizing the importance of thorough research and understanding client experiences when choosing legal representation. While advertising can be persuasive, personal reviews like this offer valuable insights into the realities of working with a law firm like Dan Newlin and Partners. Potential clients should weigh such accounts carefully as part of their decision-making process.
